May 05 2008
Gippsland by-election preview
NOTE: This post will be progressively updated until polling day to note campaign developments.
The Gippsland federal by-election has been officially set for June 28, the first of what is likely to be a series of unwelcome electoral tests for the opposition. This one follows the departure of the seat’s member since 1983, Howard government Science Minister and (later) Agriculture Minister Peter McGauran, who has quit to take a position as chief executive of Thoroughbred Breeders Australia. The by-election offers the exciting prospect of a three-way contest between the incumbent Nationals, Liberals who hope the seat might go the way of Farrer and Murray in shifting their way on the retirement of a long-serving Nationals member, and an ALP enjoying massive honeymoon leads in all published opinion polls.
The electorate of Gippsland has covered the far east of Victoria since federation, and has been in National/Country Party hands since the party was founded in 1922. Gippsland currently covers the Princes Highway towns of Morwell, Traralgon, Bairnsdale and Orbost, extending north to Maffra and Omeo. The Nationals’ hold appeared to be in serious jeopardy for the first time when the redistribution ahead of the 2004 election added Traralgon and strongly Labor-voting Morwell, a symptom of the region’s relative population decline. This cut the margin from 8.0 per cent to 2.6 per cent, but McGauran was returned in 2004 with a 5.1 per cent swing and suffered a correction of just 1.8 per cent last November.
The map below shows booth results from the 2007 election: a green number indicates a majority or swing for the Nationals, a red number for Labor. The size of the number indicates the total number of votes cast, ranging from less than 250 for the smallest to over 3000 for the largest. Click on the image to toggle between vote and swing results.
![]() |
McGauran’s retirement announcement gave impetus to scheming by Liberal operatives to impose a merger on reluctant state branches of both Coalition parties. This prompted NSW Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan to approach the state independent member for Gippsland East, Craig Ingram, to spur things along by running as a “joint Liberal-Nationals candidate”. It was concurrently suggested that a similar scheme might involve Rob Oakeshott, ex-Nationals independent member for Port Macquarie in the New South Wales parliament, if Mark Vaile called it a day in Lyne. Ingram admitted to being “interested” in Heffernan’s proposal, but the state Nationals argued Ingram had demonstrated his unsuitability by helping scuttle the Kennett government in 1999.

In any case, the Nationals were determined that the seat should go to Darren Chester (right), chief-of-staff to state party leader Peter Ryan, who was raised in Sale and lives in Lakes Entrance. Chester was opposed for preselection by 63-year-old former army officer Russell Smith, who reportedly had little support. The by-election marks Chester’s second run for parliament, his first being an unsuccessful run against Craig Ingram at the 2002 state election. He also contested Senate preselection against Peter McGauran’s brother Julian ahead of the 2004 election, but was defeated by 34 votes to 21. Senator McGauran went on to defect to the Liberal Party in January 2006.

Labor at first looked set to re-endorse their candidate from the 2007 election, East Gippsland councillor and two-time mayor Jane Rowe. However, shortly before the preselection was due to be decided by the party’s administrative committee (without reference to locals), Rowe stood aside in favour of Wellington Shire mayor Darren McCubbin (left), who had not previously been a party member. Rick Wallace of The Australian reported that some in the ALP had feared Rowe’s status as a single mother ”would prove a detriment in the deeply conservative Victorian electorate”, although Rowe insisted she had withdrawn so she could devote more time to her daughters. McCubbin’s caused friction with local branch members who backed alternative candidate David Wilson, deputy mayor of Latrobe City, with Duncan Hughes of the Financial Review writing of members being urged by dissidents not to contribute funds to the campaign. There had earlier been talk that Labor had been rebuffed in an approach to Christian Zahra, who held the neighbouring electorate of McMillan from 1998 until 2004 when he fell victim to an unfavourable redistribution and a statewide anti-Labor swing.
The Liberal candidate is 36-year-old Central Gippsland Health Service bureaucrat Rohan Fitzgerald (right), who appears to have been preselected without opposition. There were earlier suggestions that Julian McGauran might seek the nod, but few took them seriously. The Greens have nominated Yarragon doctor Malcolm McKelvie.
Further reading: Possum Comitatus at Crikey charts historical trends in Gippsland and other Coalition seats likely to face by-elections soon, concluding it to be Labor’s best shot out of the bunch (although a poor performance locally at the 2006 state election and a relatively weak swing at the federal election might suggest otherwise). Nick Economou of Monash University concurs the seat is winnable for Labor in an extensive overview of the contest on the 7.30 Report. Malcolm Mackerras argues otherwise, observing that there is no historical support for the notion that federal governments can expect favourable by-election swings during their honeymoon periods (no link located). Peter Brent weighed in at Mumble on April 27. Gerard McManus of the Herald Sun reports Labor internal polling has them on 36 per cent to the Nationals’ 32 per cent and the Liberals’ 19 per cent, which after preferences would mean a comfortable win for the Nationals.
May 6: The Nationals have filed a complaint with police after a photographer hired by Labor was caught taking pictures of Darren Chester from a parked car. Rick Wallace of The Australian reports the Nationals “believe the photographer was assigned in an attempt to catch out Mr Chester in an inadvertently unflattering pose – such as stumbling or scratching himself – with the images to be used to ridicule him in campaign ads or brochures” (in which case they would presumably have been in a position to file a complaint even if the photographer hadn’t been caught). Labor state secretary Stephen Newnham says the photographer was acting on his own initiative while in the area to take shots of Darren McCubbin, and that his actions were not condoned by the party. Peter Ryan is “expected to complain about the incident in state parliament this week”.
May 12: Glenn Milne reports on the National Party’s by-election focus group research in The Australian:
Down in rural Victoria with an industrial back end that picks up the La Trobe Valley, the good burghers of Gippsland now apparently rank the cost of living as the No1 issue at the impending by-election, according to National Party research. Based on Utting’s work and the Nationals’ own focus groups the battle that is now looming in Gippsland is one about perception. Labor will seek to convince voters that inflation and the cost of living are things largely outside their influence, especially given the context of the US sub-prime mortgage meltdown. The Nationals for their part, will be seeking to drive home the message that the prices buck stops with Rudd. Expect to see ads that feature a laughing image of the Prime Minister with text along the lines of: “To get elected, Labor promised to ease the pressure on working families,” followed by a list of increased prices including petrol, milk, cheese, bread, poultry, fruit, vegetables along with rents, electricity and house prices. Increases in interest rates, and declining consumer and business confidence indices will rightly get a guernsey as well.

May 5th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
http://latrobevalley.yourguide.com.au/news/local/general/candidate-for-greens/1237397.html
The Greens candidate was announced this morning. Not sure if it’ll matter much, but at least for completeness sake.
May 5th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
Thanks JH, I’ve thrown in a mention of him.
May 6th, 2008 at 1:20 am
These figures, rendered to great effect on the map above, have left me totally mystified.
Someone, somewhere, in Morwell and Traralgon is voting Tory. Astonishing.
May 6th, 2008 at 7:47 am
In the future you might find it useful to make the maps as Google Maps and embed them into the post. I’ve used it with some local booth maps in my area.
May 6th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
It is odd that whereas it is common at the state level for govts to win seats from the opposition this hasn’t occurred federally since the Kalgoorlie by-election of 1920. Is this simply luck? Rural seats can be resistant to swings in every state there are some that have not followed the tides to Labor at the state level. Nationals hold.
May 6th, 2008 at 6:45 pm
THR @ 3 - Every village is entitled to have one idiot!
Sadly, in my area they’ve been voting ours into parliament.
May 6th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23652119-5013871,00.html
Dirty tricks emerge from the Labor Party already.
This won’t go down well in a rural electorate.
May 7th, 2008 at 9:36 am
Since when has it been illegal for a photographer to photograph a candidate seeking public office in a public place?
May 7th, 2008 at 10:09 am
#3
It’s really only Morwell that’s the rock-solid Labor town. Traralgon is more like other provincial cities, and is generally about 50/50. Perhaps in the past the Labor vote around here was inflated by the popular Christian Zhara when part of McMillian.
Even so, the Morwell booths were not overwhelmingly Labor in 2007, and there does seem to have been a decline in the Labor vote around the Latrobe Valley. Has there been much demographic change, such as decline of the blue-collar workforce and an increase in Melbourne-based professionals commuting from the Valley??
May 7th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
Decline of the blue-collar workforce, yes; commuting, no.
May 7th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
The Valley seems a much more wealthy place than it was ten years ago. Still barely at the national average, but much improved - you can see it through the retail sector developments and even anecdotally the type of cars you see around - more new cars and more prestige cars etc.
May 10th, 2008 at 6:14 pm
Giippsland has a long term tendancy for the non labor vote to decline even if
the boundaries without any of the Latrobe valley had remained
The impacts of the last redistribution shifting non labor areas into Mcmillan
and part of the Latrobe valley into this seat have made it marginal.
But ironically the ALP has internal problems in the Latrobe valley
and their vote has been very bad in that area
The key to this seat is the Labor vote in the Traralgon subdivisions which at the last election would have averaged in the low 50s……. but a 66% vote is possible in this area for Labor.
I would be very suprised if labor could win…… but if the honeymoon stays past the budget this is possible
In the long term all of the Latrobe valley will end up in this seat and Mcmillan will
become more of an outer suburban seat